5
Average: 5 (3 votes)
NCPD Article

Young Women With Breast Cancer: Treatment, Care, and Nursing Implications

Barbara Corey
Mary Alison Smania
Heather Spotts
Michelle Andersen
CJON 2020, 24(2), 139-147 DOI: 10.1188/20.CJON.139-147

Background: Young women with breast cancer (YWBC) are more likely to have aggressive disease, carry mutations for hereditary cancer genes, and experience higher mortality. They also may face reduced fertility because of the toxicity of chemotherapy.

Objectives: This article aims to present a review of YWBC treatments, sequelae of treatment, and psychosocial challenges.

Methods: The authors performed a review of guideline-supported treatment options, patient resources, and nursing implications.

Findings: Because of high-risk cancers and a lack of specific treatment guidelines, healthcare providers may consider aggressive treatments for younger patients. However, studies indicate that the foundation for treatment decisions for YWBC are best based on disease stage and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.

Earn free contact hours: Click here to connect to the evaluation. Certified nurses can claim no more than 0.5 total ILNA points for this program. Up to 0.65 ILNA points may be applied to Treatment OR Symptom Management OR Psychosocial OR Survivorship. See www.oncc.org for complete details on certification.

An estimated 7% of women newly diagnosed with breast cancer are aged younger than 40 years (North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, n.d.). In women aged 15–39 years, breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death (Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program, 2019). Although the rate of breast cancer incidence in women older than age 50 years has remained stable, it is increasing in young women by 0.5% each year (Guo et al., 2018). In the past 40 years, survival rates from all stages of breast cancer have improved for young women by 60%–70% (Guo et al., 2018). However, because of later presentation and unfavorable tumor biology, young women with breast cancer (YWBC) continue to experience the highest mortality (Fredholm et al., 2016; Partridge et al., 2016). This is particularly evident in young African American women, who have the highest rates of aggressive disease and subsequent mortality (Chollet-Hinton et al., 2017; Kohler et al., 2015).

Women younger than age 40 years rarely undergo screening, so their cancers are primarily self-detected, larger, and more advanced than screen-detected tumors (Samphao et al., 2009). YWBC are more often carriers of hereditary cancer gene mutations and may face risk-reducing surgeries (Buys et al., 2017). They may experience infertility and early menopause from chemotherapy; for survivors, a long life expectancy portends a greater risk of recurrence and second cancers (Fredholm et al., 2016; He & Zou, 2017; Raymond & Hogue, 2006).

There are no treatment guidelines specific to YWBC. Studies and expert opinion indicate that treatment decisions for YWBC are best based on disease stage and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines (Cardoso et al., 2019; NCCN, 2019a; Suter & Pagani, 2018). Based on guidelines, this article presents a review of YWBC treatments, the sequelae of treatment, psychosocial challenges, patient resources, and nursing implications. In addition, a patient case study (see Figure 1) provides an example of treatment options for YWBC.

Breast Cancer Staging

Clinical prognostic stage is computed for all patients with breast cancer at diagnosis using anatomic staging or the TNM (tumor, node, and metastases) based on history, physical examination, imaging studies (if performed), and relevant biopsies (Giuliano et al., 2017). Clinical prognostic stage incorporates grade and size of tumor and the status of biomarkers (i.e., estrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PR], and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]). For those whose first phase of treatment is surgery, a pathologic prognostic table will assign stage based on clinical information and findings from resected tissue (e.g., tumor size, lymph node involvement, presence of histologically proven metastasis) (Hortobagyi et al., 2018). The treatment plan for YWBC is a collaboration including contributions from specialists: the oncology nurse, nurse navigator, advanced practice nurse, genetic specialist, surgeon, plastic surgeon, fertility expert, medical oncologist, radiation oncologist, and a social worker or psychologist (Cardoso et al., 2019; Cohen et al., 2016; Daem et al., 2019; Saini et al., 2011).

Fertility Counseling

The American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Oktay et al., 2018) and the NCCN (2019a) mandate counseling for fertility preservation for patients of reproductive age who will receive gametotoxic treatment. Healthcare providers are advised to discuss reproductive risks and treatment options directly after diagnosis and refer concerned patients to the appropriate experts before treatment begins. Foreknowledge of risks has been shown to reduce stress and improve quality of life (Partridge et al., 2004; Quinn et al., 2009).

A reproductive endocrinologist will evaluate a patient for reproductive potential based on the patient’s age and chemotherapy treatment. Women aged 20–29 years are most fertile; by age 35, fertility begins to decline rapidly (American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2019). Chemotherapy can reduce ovary size and follicle count and hasten menopause by 10 years (Wenners et al., 2017). A woman who has completed treatment for breast cancer is 70% less likely to be able to conceive as compared to healthy women at the same age (Peccatori et al., 2013).

In the interval between surgery and chemotherapy, assisted reproductive technologies (ART), such as in vitro fertilization, can be used to produce embryos, and cryopreservation can be used to store embryos and/or eggs for the future. Although these technologies do not appear to increase risk of recurrence or birth defects (Maheshwari et al., 2012; Pelkonen et al., 2014), only a small percentage of patients choose to use ART (Ruddy et al., 2014). Reasons may include lack of information, fear of treatment delay or disease recurrence, lack of a stable partner, or cost (Lambertini et al., 2014; Waks & Partridge, 2016). Reproductive technologies are costly. Only five states in the United States cover standard fertility preservation services for patients who receive gametotoxic treatments, and only 17 states cover some form of fertility treatment (American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2019). Figure 2 lists fertility resources for patients.

After completing chemotherapy, women are advised to wait 6–24 months before pursuing pregnancy because the risk of recurrence is highest within the first two years after treatment ends (Larson et al., 2018; Taylan & Oktay, 2017). Compared to cancer survivors who do not conceive, pregnancy does not appear to be hazardous to health and may even be beneficial (Azim et al., 2013).

In a survey of 319 young breast cancer survivors four years after diagnosis, 53% were satisfied with information provided about fertility and 43% were satisfied with information provided about sexuality (Ben Charif et al., 2015). Fertility and sexuality discussions are a crucial component of patient–provider communication (Quinn et al., 2010). Oncology nurses providing direct care can create a safe place for a patient to discuss her fears and concerns and ask practical questions regarding fertility and sexuality.

Local Treatment Types

Surgery

As with all patients diagnosed with breast cancer, treatment recommendations for breast-conserving surgery (lumpectomy) with whole-breast radiation versus mastectomy are based on tumor stage, tumor size and focality, recurrence risk, breast size and cosmesis, access to treatment, and patient preference (Bellavance & Kesmodel, 2016). Diagnosis at a young age does not automatically require mastectomy (Suter & Pagani, 2018), but if mastectomy is the treatment of choice, breast reconstruction is a standard option in the plan of care. Studies of more than 20,000 YWBC reveal that mastectomy versus lumpectomy with radiation have the same rates of survival (Smith et al., 2018).

For YWBC, as with all patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer or high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ, patients undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy during lumpectomy or mastectomy. If sentinel node biopsy indicates spread of cancer to the lymph nodes, the standard of care is axillary node dissection (NCCN, 2019a).

For any patient after lymph node dissection, lymphedema can occur in the ipsilateral arm. Lymphedema management includes focused exercises, massage, compression bandages, and diet, but it has no cure. Other long-term side effects of surgery can include neuropathy, persistent pain, decreased range of motion in the arm and shoulder, and diminished sensation in the chest and arm. Oncology nurses can educate patients about the signs and symptoms of postsurgical sequelae, suggest methods to reduce symptoms and risk of recurrence and to protect and restore function, and refer to a lymphedema specialist when needed (Acebedo, 2015).

Breast reconstruction can include an implant (saline or silicone) or autologous reconstruction (using the patient’s own tissue), which may also require an implant. Other breast reconstruction options can include skin-sparing and/or nipple-sparing mastectomies, which have recurrence rates comparable to mastectomy, but with better cosmetic results (Frey et al., 2019; Headon et al., 2016; Smith et al., 2017). Immediate breast reconstruction is preferred by many patients and has the same survival rate as mastectomy without reconstruction (Siotos et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2017).

Radiation Therapy

For young women with early-stage breast cancer who have undergone breast-conserving surgery, radiation therapy is recommended postsurgery to lower the risk of cancer recurrence. Traditional whole-breast radiation therapy is typically administered once per day, five days per week, for five to seven weeks, followed by a supplemental boost dose to the tumor bed, recommended for most women aged younger than 50 years (NCCN, 2019a). Alternatively, accelerated or hypofractionated whole-breast radiation gives the same total dose over three to five weeks via a larger, weekly dose (Kim et al., 2016), which may be preferred by YWBC because of career and family responsibilities.

Indications for radiation postmastectomy include 5 cm or larger tumor size, lymphatic or vascular tumor invasion, positive tumor margins postresection, one or more positive lymph nodes, and/or tumor invasion to skin (possible with locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer) (NCCN, 2019a).

An acute radiation side effect is radiation dermatitis. On one end of the spectrum, it can appear as a mild, sunburn-like rash, causing itchy or flaky skin; on the other end of the spectrum, it can appear as blisters or wet, peeling skin (moist desquamation) (Suresh et al., 2019). Long-term radiation effects can include lymphedema; changes to skin color or breast texture; shrinkage of the skin or of the capsule around the implant; damage to heart muscle, lungs, or ribs; pneumonitis; and, rarely, a second malignancy. For YWBC, there is added concern about safeguarding organs against long-term damage and secondary comorbidities.

Systemic Treatment Types

Adjuvant Chemotherapy

About 80% of YWBC receive systemic chemotherapy to reduce the risk of recurrence (American College of Surgeons, 2020). Chemotherapy agents include traditional broad-spectrum cytotoxic agents, as well as newer targeted biologics. Although few chemotherapy clinical trials target YWBC, subgroup analyses indicate that the same treatments are equally efficacious at all ages.

Young women with triple-negative breast cancer have neither hormone nor HER2 receptors and can only be treated with conventional chemotherapy. For patients with ER-positive early-stage breast cancer, multigene tests can detect somatic changes in select tumor genes. Results from these tests help identify patients with an elevated risk of recurrence who may benefit from chemotherapy and patients at low risk who may safely forego chemotherapy. In addition, there are computer-based tools that provide algorithms to predict treatment effectiveness from adjuvant therapy.

For each patient with breast cancer, chemotherapy regimens are chosen based on tumor pathology, stage, comorbidities, toxicity, and patient preference. The most frequently administered agents are cyclophosphamide, anthracyclines (e.g., doxorubicin, epirubicin), taxanes (e.g., paclitaxel, docetaxel), platinum (e.g., carboplatin), and 5-fluorouracil. Regimens with cyclophosphamide are most likely to cause infertility or amenorrhea, platinum and anthracyclines are associated with intermediate risk, and the remaining therapies are low risk (Taylan & Oktay, 2017).

Systemic regimens are administered in cycles of three to four weeks for three to six months. In contrast, a dose-dense schedule delivers the same dose over one to two weeks. Dose-dense regimens may be associated with increased side effects. For premenopausal women with high-risk tumors, dose-dense regimen studies report moderately decreased risk of recurrence and increased survival without increasing ovarian toxicity (Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group, 2019; Goldvaser et al., 2018).

Depending on specific chemotherapies administered and the patient’s response to the regimen, the patient may experience nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, neutropenia, and other short- and long-term side effects, such as cognitive impairment, fatigue, changes in libido, weight gain, hair loss, and osteopenia/osteoporosis (Ljungman et al., 2018; Runowicz et al., 2016). Anthracyclines are associated with cardiotoxicity, which may lead to congestive heart failure. Taxanes are associated with peripheral neuropathy, which may resolve gradually or persist. Nurses can educate YWBC about healthy lifestyle alterations and when to report symptoms (e.g., shortness of breath, fatigue), and advise patients about safety concerns, such as risks for burns and falls because of diminished sensation.

HER2-positive tumors are more aggressive, have a poorer prognosis, and are more common in YWBC (as much as 34% versus 12% in the population aged older than 45 years) (Howlader et al., 2014). The anti-HER2 agents trastuzumab and pertuzumab are targeted biologics that can be administered as neoadjuvant, or adjuvant, or for one year following treatment; as one study reports, they can reduce mortality by more than 30% in YWBC (Perez et al., 2014). However, these agents, particularly given in combination with anthracyclines, may compromise heart function.

A development beneficial to YWBC is the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists. Agonists, like goserelin, block pituitary secretion of the hormones that stimulate ovulation. Without these hormones, the ovary goes into a resting state, possibly insulating the ovary from some of the harmful effects of chemotherapy that lead to amenorrhea and early menopause. GnRH agonists are administered with chemotherapy or post-treatment, whether the tumor is hormone receptor–positive or –negative (Lambertini et al., 2018; NCCN, 2019a).

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is administered before surgery as a single agent or as combination therapy for three to six months (NCCN, 2019a). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is standard of care for inflammatory breast cancer (Ueno et al., 2018).

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can shrink tumors (enabling conservative surgery), downstage axillary lymph nodes, reveal the effect of chemotherapy on the tumor, and is effective against HER2-positive and triple-negative tumors. It also affords time for genetic testing and consideration of surgical options. Disadvantages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy include staging inaccuracy (i.e., tumor size is accurately measured only after surgery). For patients who do not respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgical treatment is still the standard of care. Staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy has not been validated; therefore, prognosis is based on pretreatment clinical factors (Santa-Maria et al., 2015).

Endocrine Therapy

Young women with ER-positive cancers may receive endocrine therapy (i.e., tamoxifen) post-treatment for five years or more to reduce the risk of recurrence (Burstein et al., 2014). However, with prolonged therapy, reproductive capacity declines. In addition, tamoxifen can stimulate ovulation and harm the fetus in an unintended pregnancy, so barrier methods of birth control are advised (barrier methods are recommended during all phases of treatment). Side effects, such as decreased libido, vaginal dryness, hot flashes, and an increased risk of uterine cancer, are troubling to patients. Therefore, more than 20% of YWBC are nonadherent, increasing their risk of recurrence (Huiart et al., 2012; Saha et al., 2017). Women who become postmenopausal may receive an aromatase inhibitor instead (Dowsett et al., 2010). Patient education about endocrine therapy covers symptoms to report, which includes unusual vaginal bleeding.

Genetic Testing

The NCCN (2019b) establishes yearly practice guidelines for hereditary cancer gene testing. As of 2019, any woman aged 50 years or younger with breast cancer, regardless of family history, is a candidate for testing, as is any woman with triple-negative cancer aged 60 years or younger. Using a panel of 25 hereditary cancer genes, a study by Buys et al. (2017) tested more than 35,000 women with breast cancer. Overall, 9% tested positive for a gene mutation, but the positive rate for women aged younger than 40 years was 14%, and was 14% for women with triple-negative breast cancer (Buys et al., 2017). BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations were detected in 49% of women who had mutations, followed by mutations in numerous moderate-risk genes—most commonly CHEK2 (12%), ATM (10%), and PALB2 (9%) (Economopoulou et al., 2015). A study by Couch et al. (2017) used a 21-gene panel and tested 41,000 women with breast cancer. Ten percent tested positive for a mutation, two-thirds of whom had BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. The other most common gene mutations were CHEK2, ATM, and PALB2 (Couch et al., 2017). Genetic testing results can inform patient treatment, post-treatment surveillance, and further genetic testing of family members.

Psychosocial Concerns

YWBC experience multiple psychosocial concerns. Among those concerns are family life, work life, sexuality, body image, fertility, recurrence fears, financial toxicity, and patient–provider communication. Resources for these concerns can be found in Figure 3.

In clinical practice, one of the first questions typically posed by newly diagnosed YWBC is, “How do I talk to my children?” A qualitative study by Asbury et al. (2014) showed the process of decision making that women go through in telling their children about their diagnosis. Two themes emerged: the importance of maintaining normality and minimizing one’s own feelings. Compared to young survivors without children, young mothers reported greater fear of recurrence and illness intrusiveness in life domains (Arès et al., 2014).

In multiple qualitative studies, younger women reported greater likelihood of depression, heightened levels of stress, greater distress because of changes in body image, and reduced quality of life as compared to older women (Ahmad et al., 2015; Champion et al., 2014; Howard-Anderson et al., 2012; Rosenberg et al., 2012). YWBC may benefit from education about the importance of social support, how to garner that support, and how to be specific when requesting help (Hauken & Larsen, 2019). Oncology nurses aware of these specific concerns are well equipped and in an ideal position to support YWBC throughout their cancer trajectory.

Financial toxicity is a broad term that describes the financial impact of a health problem on the patient and healthcare system. Cancer is one of the most costly medical conditions to treat in the United States (Soni, 2015), but this reflects only a portion of the problem specific to healthcare dollars spent. YWBC cope with layers of financial distress, including missed time from work (reduced income), large deductibles, added prescriptions with co-payments, additional childcare needs, and transportation costs (Mujahid et al., 2010).

Implications for Nursing

YWBC can experience anxiety and emotional distress from their diagnosis. In addition, they may have concerns about fertility, future pregnancies, child-rearing responsibilities, and sexuality, in addition to side effects of treatment. These issues can affect their quality of life.

Genetic testing is frequently indicated for YWBC. Nurses can provide education to help them understand testing and its implications and resources for education of other family members who may also be candidates for testing.

Nurses can also educate patients about common side effects before they occur. Postmenopausal symptoms can result from the estrogen deprivation caused by ovarian suppression from cancer treatment and can disrupt quality of life. This may be exacerbated in YWBC because they may not anticipate these changes at this point in their lives. The most common symptoms include hot flashes, night sweats, moodiness, anxiety, fatigue, depression, difficulty sleeping, and weight gain.

Additional changes may affect sexual health. Sexual desire may be affected by medications used for treatment, and vaginal dryness may lead to dyspareunia. Discussions of sexual concerns are often difficult. Therefore, nurses may ask about concerns related to sexual function, sexual activity, or sexual relationships and whether those concerns are causing distress. If so, a referral should be made to a social worker, sexual couples counselor, gynecologist, urologist, or sexual health specialist. In addition, YWBC may have concerns about fertility. Nurses can provide resources and/or referrals to fertility specialists before beginning systemic treatment.

Body image can be affected by lumpectomy or mastectomy, treatment-induced alopecia, hot flashes, and post-treatment weight gain. Nurses can support YWBC through screening for anxiety, depression, and distress, and referring to the psychosocial team.

One common comment among YWBC survivors is that everything happened so quickly after diagnosis that they did not always receive the information or encouragement they wanted and needed to make informed decisions about treatment and about their fertility (Gorman et al., 2011). Nurses can help fill this gap. With their knowledge and teaching skills, they can inform and support YWBC and smooth the path to treatment and survivorship.

Conclusion

Young women diagnosed with breast cancer range from very young women to women who are firmly planted in adulthood. Compared to older women, YWBC are more likely to have aggressive cancers with less favorable biologies. In addition, they face many challenges (e.g., emotional, familial, professional, logistical, reproductive, financial, psychological, physical, existential) related to their stage in life that contribute to and complicate cancer treatment decision making. Their treatment should be guided by NCCN guidelines based on staging. The goals for these patients must also take into consideration their potentially long lifetime and the effects of treatment on quality of life.

As an independent researcher, Corey is indebted to the Wayne State University Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics for access to the Vera P. Shiffman Medical Library. The authors gratefully acknowledge Jessica Shira Sender, MLS, MET, for research assistance.

About the Author(s)

Barbara Corey, MS, CGC, is an independent researcher; and Mary Alison Smania, DNP, FNP-BC, AGN-BC, FAANP, is an assistant professor in the College of Nursing and the College of Human Medicine–Surgery Breast Center, Heather Spotts, LMSW, OSW-C, is an oncology social worker in the College of Medicine at the Breslin Cancer Center, and Michelle Andersen, DNP, FNP-BC, is a nurse practitioner in the College of Human Medicine–Surgery Breast Center, all at Michigan State University in Lansing. The authors take full responsibility for this content and did not receive honoraria or disclose any relevant financial relationships. The article has been reviewed by independent peer reviewers to ensure that it is objective and free from bias. Corey can be reached at barbaracoreycgc@gmail.com, with copy to CJONEditor@ons.org. (Submitted July 2019. Accepted September 27, 2019.)

 

References 

Acebedo, J.C. (2015). Minimizing breast cancer-related lymphedema. Practice Nursing, 26(2), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.12968/pnur.2015.26.2.79

Ahmad, S., Fergus, K., & McCarthy, M. (2015). Psychosocial issues experienced by young women with breast cancer: The minority group with the majority of need. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care, 9(3), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000162

American College of Surgeons. (2020). Public access to cancer data. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/cancer/ncdb/publicaccess

American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2019). Female cancers, cryopreservation, and fertility. https://www.reproductivefacts.org/news-and-publications/patient-fact-she...

Arès, I., Lebel, S., & Bielajew, C. (2014). The impact of motherhood on perceived stress, illness intrusiveness and fear of cancer recurrence in young breast cancer survivors over time. Psychology and Health, 29(6), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2014.881998

Asbury, N., Lalayiannis, L., & Walshe, A. (2014). How do I tell the children? Women’s experiences of sharing information about breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 18(6), 564–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2014.07.003

Azim, H.A., Jr., Kroman, N., Paesmans, M., Gelber, S., Rotmensz, N., Ameye, L., . . . Peccatori, F.A. (2013). Prognostic impact of pregnancy after breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status: A multicenter retrospective study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.44.2285

Bellavance, E.C., & Kesmodel, S.B. (2016). Decision-making in the surgical treatment of breast cancer: Factors influencing women’s choices for mastectomy and breast conserving surgery. Frontiers in Oncology, 6, 74. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2016.00074

Ben Charif, A., Bouhnik, A.D., Rey, D., Provansal, M., Courbiere, B., Spire, B., & Mancini, J. (2015). Satisfaction with fertility- and sexuality-related information in young women with breast cancer-ELIPPSE40 cohort. BMC Cancer, 15(1), 572. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1542-0

Burstein, H.J., Temin, S., Anderson, H., Buchholz, T.A., Davidson, N.E., Gelmon, K.E., . . . Griggs, J.J. (2014). Adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline focused update. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32(21), 2255–2269. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.54.2258

Buys, S.S., Sandbach, J.F., Gammon, A., Patel, G., Kidd, J., Brown, K.L., . . . Daly, M.B. (2017). A study of over 35,000 women with breast cancer tested with a 25-gene panel of hereditary cancer genes. Cancer, 123(10), 1721–1730. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30498

Cardoso, F., Kyriakides, S., Ohno, S., Penault-Llorca, F., Poortmans, P., Rubio, I.T., . . . Senkus, E. (2019). Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology, 30(10), 1674. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz189

Champion, V.L., Wagner, L.I., Monahan, P.O., Daggy, J., Smith, L., Cohee, A., . . . Sledge, G.W., Jr. (2014). Comparison of younger and older breast cancer survivors and age-matched controls on specific and overall quality of life domains. Cancer, 120(15), 2237–2246. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28737

Chollet-Hinton, L., Olshan, A.F., Nichols, H.B., Anders, C.K., Lund, J.L., Allott, E.H., . . . Troester, M.A. (2017). Biology and etiology of young-onset breast cancers among premenopausal African American women: Results from the AMBER Consortium. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, 26(12), 1722–1729. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0450

Cohen, L., Hamer, J., Helwig, C., Fergus, K., Kiss, A., Mandel, R., . . . Warner, E. (2016). Formal evaluation of PYNK: Breast cancer program for young women—the patient perspective. Current Oncology, 23(2), e102–e108. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.2773

Couch, F.J., Shimelis, H., Hu, C., Hart, S.N., Polley, E.C., Na, J., . . . Dolinsky, J.S. (2017). Associations between cancer predisposition testing panel genes and breast cancer. JAMA Oncology, 3(9), 1190–1196. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0424

Daem, M., Verbrugghe, M., Schrauwen, W., Leroux, S., Van Hecke, A., & Grypdonck, M. (2019). How interdisciplinary teamwork contributes to psychosocial cancer support. Cancer Nursing, 42(3), E11–E20. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000588

Dowsett, M., Cuzick, J., Ingle, J., Coates, A., Forbes, J., Bliss, J., . . . Peto, R. (2010). Meta-analysis of breast cancer outcomes in adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28(3), 509–518. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.23.1274

Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. (2019). Increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy by more frequent administration or sequential scheduling: A patient-level meta-analysis of 37 298 women with early breast cancer in 26 randomised trials. Lancet, 393(10179), 1440–1452. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)33137-4

Economopoulou, P., Dimitriadis, G., & Psyrri, A. (2015). Beyond BRCA: New hereditary breast cancer susceptibility genes. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 41(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.10.008

Fredholm, H., Magnusson, K., Lindström, L.S., Garmo, H., Fält, S.E., Lindman, H., . . . Fredriksson, I. (2016). Long-term outcome in young women with breast cancer: A population-based study. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 160(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3983-9

Frey, J.D., Salibian, A.A., Lee, J., Harris, K., Axelrod, D.M., Guth, A.A., . . . Choi, M. (2019). Oncologic trends, outcomes, and risk factors for locoregional recurrence: An analysis of tumor-to-nipple distance and critical factors in therapeutic nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 143(6), 1575–1585. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000005600

Giuliano, A.E., Connolly, J.L., Edge, S.B., Mittendorf, E.A., Rugo, H.S., Solin, L.J., . . . Hortobagyi, G.N. (2017). Breast cancer-major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 67(4), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21393

Goldvaser, H., Majeed, H., Ribnikar, D., Šeruga, B., Ocaña, A., Cescon, D.W., & Amir, E. (2018). Influence of control group therapy on the benefit from dose-dense chemotherapy in early breast cancer: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 169(3), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4710-5

Gorman, J.R., Usita, P.M., Madlensky, L., & Pierce, J.P. (2011). Young breast cancer survivors: Their perspectives on treatment decisions and fertility concerns. Cancer Nursing, 34(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181e4528d

Guo, F., Kuo, Y.F., Shih, Y.C.T., Giordano, S.H., & Berenson, A.B. (2018). Trends in breast cancer mortality by stage at diagnosis among young women in the United States. Cancer, 124(17), 3500–3509. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31638

Hauken, M.A., & Larsen, T.M.B. (2019). Young adult cancer patients’ experiences of private social network support during cancer treatment. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28(15–16), 2953–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14899

He, X.M., & Zou, D.H. (2017). The association of young age with local recurrence in women with early-stage breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy: A meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 11058. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10729-9

Headon, H.L., Kasem, A., & Mokbel, K. (2016). The oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy: A systematic review of the literature with a pooled analysis of 12,358 procedures. Archives of Plastic Surgery, 43(4), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2016.43.4.328

Hortobagyi, G.N., Connolly, J.L., D’Orsi, C.J., Egde, S.B., Mittendorf, E.A., Rugo, H.S., . . . Giuliano, A. (2018). Breast. In M.B. Amin (Ed.), AJCC cancer staging manual (8th ed., pp. 589–636). American College of Surgeons.

Howard-Anderson, J., Ganz, P.A., Bower, J.E., & Stanton, A.L. (2012). Quality of life, fertility concerns, and behavioral health outcomes in younger breast cancer survivors: A systematic review. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 104(5), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr541

Howlader, N., Altekruse, S.F., Li, C.I., Chen, V.W., Clarke, C.A., Ries, L.A.G., & Cronin, K.A. (2014). US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 106(5), dju055. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju055

Huiart, L., Bouhnik, A.D., Rey, D., Tarpin, C., Cluze, C., Bendiane, M.K., . . . Giorgi, R. (2012). Early discontinuation of tamoxifen intake in younger women with breast cancer: Is it time to rethink the way it is prescribed? European Journal of Cancer, 48(13), 1939–1946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.03.004

Kim, K.S., Shin, K.H., Choi, N., & Lee, S.W. (2016). Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation: New standard in early breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery. Radiation Oncology Journal, 34(2), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2016.01697

Kohler, B.A., Sherman, R.L., Howlader, N., Jemal, A., Ryerson, A.B., Henry, K.A., . . . Penberthy, L. (2015). Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2011, featuring incidence of breast cancer subtypes by race/ethnicity, poverty, and state. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 107(6), djv048. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv048

Lambertini, M., Moore, H.C.F., Leonard, R.C.F., Loibl, S., Munster, P., Bruzzone, M., . . . Del Mastro, L. (2018). Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy for preservation of ovarian function and fertility in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient-level data. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 36(19), 1981–1990. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.0858

Lambertini, M., Pinto, A., & Del Mastro, L. (2014). Fertility issues in young breast cancer patients: What women want. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 6(6), 584–588. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.06.12

Larson, K.E., Grobmyer, S.R., & Valente, S.A. (2018). Evaluation of recurrence patterns and survival in modern series of young women with breast cancer. Breast Journal, 24(5), 749–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13041

Ljungman, L., Ahlgren, J., Petersson, L.M., Flynn, K.E., Weinfurt, K., Gorman, J.R., . . . Lampic, C. (2018). Sexual dysfunction and reproductive concerns in young women with breast cancer: Type, prevalence, and predictors of problems. Psycho-Oncology, 27(12), 2770–2777. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4886

Maheshwari, A., Pandey, S., Shetty, A., Hamilton, M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2012). Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 98(2), 368–377.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.019

Mujahid, M.S., Janz, N.K., Hawley, S.T., Griggs, J.J., Hamilton, A.S., & Katz, S.J. (2010). The impact of sociodemographic, treatment, and work support on missed work after breast cancer diagnosis. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 119(1), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0389-y

National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2019a). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Breast cancer [v.3.2019]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf

National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2019b). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: Breast, ovarian, and pancreatic [v.1.2019]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_screening.pdf

North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. (n.d.). North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. https://www.naaccr.org

Oktay, K., Harvey, B.E., Partridge, A.H., Quinn, G.P., Reinecke, J., Taylor, H.S., . . . Loren, A.W. (2018). Fertility preservation in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 36(19), 1994–2001. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.1914

Partridge, A.H., Gelber, S., Peppercorn, J., Sampson, E., Knudsen, K., Laufer, M., . . . Winer, E.P. (2004). Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(20), 4174–4183. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.01.159

Partridge, A.H., Hughes, M.E., Warner, E.T., Ottesen, R.A., Wong, Y.N., Edge, S.B., . . . Tamimi, R.M. (2016). Subtype-dependent relationship between young age at diagnosis and breast cancer survival. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 34(27), 3308–3314. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.65.8013

Peccatori, F.A., Azim, H.A., Jr., Orecchia, R., Hoekstra, H.J., Pavlidis, N., Kesic, V., & Pentheroudakis, G. (2013). Cancer, pregnancy and fertility: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology, 24(Suppl. 6), vi160–vi170. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt199

Pelkonen, S., Hartikainen, A.L., Ritvanen, A., Koivunen, R., Martikainen, H., Gissler, M., & Tiitinen, A. (2014). Major congenital anomalies in children born after frozen embryo transfer: A cohort study 1995–2006. Human Reproduction, 29(7), 1552–1557. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu088

Perez, E.A., Romond, E.H., Suman, V.J., Jeong, J.H., Sledge, G., Geyer, C.E., Jr., . . . Wolmark, N. (2014). Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: Planned joint analysis of overall survival from NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32(33), 3744–3752. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.55.5730

Quinn, G.P., Vadaparampil, S.T., Jacobsen, P.B., Knapp, C., Keefe, D.L., & Bell, G.E. (2010). Frozen hope: Fertility preservation for women with cancer. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health, 55(2), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.07.009

Quinn, G.P., Vadaparampil, S.T., Lee, J.H., Jacobsen, P.B., Bepler, G., Lancaster, J., . . . Albrecht, T.L. (2009). Physician referral for fertility preservation in oncology patients: A national study of practice behaviors. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27(35), 5952–5957. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.23.0250

Raymond, J.S., & Hogue, C.J.R. (2006). Multiple primary tumours in women following breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 94(11), 1745–1750. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603172

Rosenberg, S.M., Tamimi, R.M., Gelber, S., Ruddy, K.J., Kereakoglow, S., Borges, V.F., . . . Partridge, A.H. (2012). Body image in recently diagnosed young women with early breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 22(8), 1849–1855. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3221

Ruddy, K.J., Gelber, S.I., Tamimi, R.M., Ginsburg, E.S., Schapira, L., Come, S.E., . . . Partridge, A.H. (2014). Prospective study of fertility concerns and preservation strategies in young women with breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32(11), 1151–1156. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.52.8877

Runowicz, C.D., Leach, C.R., Henry, N.L., Henry, K.S., Mackey, H.T., Cowens-Alvarado, R.L., . . . Ganz, P.A. (2016). American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology breast cancer survivorship care guideline. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 66(1), 43–73. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21319

Saha, P., Regan, M.M., Pagani, O., Francis, P.A., Walley, B.A., Ribi, K., . . . Fleming, G.F. (2017). Treatment efficacy, adherence, and quality of life among women younger than 35 years in the International Breast Cancer Study Group TEXT and SOFT Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35(27), 3113–3122. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.72.0946

Saini, K.S., Taylor, C., Ramirez, A.J., Palmieri, C., Gunnarsson, U., Schmoll, H.J., . . . de Azambuja, E. (2011). Role of the multidisciplinary team in breast cancer management: Results from a large international survey involving 39 countries. Annals of Oncology, 23(4), 853–859. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdr352

Samphao, S., Wheeler, A.J., Rafferty, E., Michaelson, J.S., Specht, M.C., Gadd, M.A., . . . Smith, B.L. (2009). Diagnosis of breast cancer in women age 40 and younger: Delays in diagnosis result from underuse of genetic testing and breast imaging. American Journal of Surgery, 198(4), 538–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.06.010

Santa-Maria, C.A., Camp, M., Cimino-Mathews, A., Harvey, S., Wright, J., & Stearns, V. (2015). Neoadjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer: Current practice, controversies, and future directions. Oncology, 29(11), 828–838.

Siotos, C., Naska, A., Bello, R.J., Uzosike, A., Orfanos, P., Euhus, D.M., . . . Rosson, G.D. (2017). Survival and disease recurrence rates among breast cancer patients following mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 144(2), 169e–177e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005798.

Smith, B.D., Bellon, J.R., Blitzblau, R., Freedman, G., Haffty, B., Hahn, C., . . . Jagsi, R. (2018). Radiation therapy for the whole breast: Executive summary of an American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based guideline. Practical Radiation Oncology, 8(3), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2018.01.012

Smith, B.L., Tang, R., Rai, U., Plichta, J.K., Colwell, A.S., Gadd, M.A., . . . Coopey, S.B. (2017). Oncologic safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in women with breast cancer. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 225(3), 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.06.013

Soni, A. (2015). Statistical brief #470: Trends in the five most costly conditions among the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population, 2002 and 2012. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st470/stat470.pdf

Suresh, R., Raffi, J., Yuen, F., & Murase, J.E. (2019). Treatment of moist desquamation for patients undergoing radiotherapy. International Journal of Women’s Dermatology, 5(2), 124–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2018.12.002

Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program. (2019). SEER*Stat Database Mortality—All COD, Aggregated With State, Total U.S. (1990–2016), National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, released April 2019. https://www.seer.cancer.gov

Suter, M.B., & Pagani, O. (2018). Should age impact breast cancer management in young women? Fine tuning of treatment guidelines. Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, 10, 1758835918776923. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835918776923

Taylan, E., & Oktay, K.H. (2017). Current state and controversies in fertility preservation in women with breast cancer. World Journal of Clinical Oncology, 8(3), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v8.i3.241

Ueno, N.T., Espinosa Fernandez, J.R., Cristofanilli, M., Overmoyer, B., Rea, D., Berdichevski, F., . . . Woodward, W.A. (2018). International consensus on the clinical management of inflammatory breast cancer from the Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program 10th Anniversary Conference. Journal of Cancer, 9(8), 1437–1447. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.23969

Waks, A.G., & Partridge, A.H. (2016). Fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer: Necessity, methods, and safety. Journal of National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 14(3), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2016.0038

Wenners, A., Grambach, J., Koss, J., Maass, N., Jonat, W., Schmutzler, A., & Mundhenke, C. (2017). Reduced ovarian reserve in young early breast cancer patients: Preliminary data from a prospective cohort trial. BMC Cancer, 17, 632. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3593-x

Zhang, P., Li, C.Z., Wu, C.T., Jiao, G.M., Yan, F., Zhu, H.C., & Zhang, X.P. (2017). Comparison of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy and mastectomy alone for breast cancer: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 43(2), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.006