December 2007, Volume 11, Number 6

 

Feature Article

Putting Evidence Into Practice®: Evidence-Based Interventions for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

 

 

Constance Visovsky, PhD, RN, ACNP, Mary Collins, MSN, RN, OCN®, Linda Abbott, RN, MSN, AOCN®, CWON, Julie Aschenbrenner, RN, BSN, OCN®, and Connie Hart, BSN, RN, OCN®

 

 

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) continues to be a significant, debilitating symptom resulting from the administration of neurotoxic chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer. CIPN is an important consequence of cancer treatment because of its potential impact on physical functioning and quality of life. Oncology nurses play an important role in assessing, monitoring, and educating clients about CIPN. Despite investigations concerning pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches to either preventing or minimizing the neurotoxicity resulting from certain chemotherapeutic agents, evidence to support the interventions is lacking. This article presents information concerning CIPN and summarizes the evidence for pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches to the prevention and treatment of CIPN.

 

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a significant, debilitating symptom directly related to the administration of neurotoxic chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer. CIPN compromises quality of life and results in pain or discomfort (Cavaletti & Zanna, 2002). Peripheral neuropathy is the end result of peripheral, motor, sensory, and autonomic neuron damage secondary to neurotoxic chemotherapy agents that inactivate the components required to maintain the metabolic needs of the axon (Postma & Heimans, 2000). Given the lack of standardized measurement and reporting mechanisms, the incidence of CIPN is relatively unknown. However, the incidence of severe CIPN has been estimated at 3%–7% in people treated with single agents, and upwards of 38% in those treated with multiple chemotherapeutic agents (Cavaletti & Zanna).

 

The chemotherapeutic agents most often associated with CIPN are platinum compounds, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, thalidomide, and bortezomib. CIPN is a concern for patients and clinicians, as manifestations of neurotoxicity can result in chemotherapy dose reductions, treatment delays, or discontinuation of treatment.

 

Although no standard therapy exists for the prevention or treatment of CIPN, nursing care can improve associated symptoms. A lack of consensus regarding assessment measurements and subsequent grading of CIPN makes comparisons among studies of CIPN difficult. Most assessments of CIPN reported in the literature used combinations of subjective symptom reports and objective clinical measurements. Figure 1 displays the most common characteristics of CIPN.

 

Search Strategy

 

This evidence-based review of interventions specifically aimed at the prevention or treatment of CIPN was drawn from an examination of the literature that included pilot studies, clinical trials, systematic reviews of the literature, and case studies. The Oncology Nursing Society Putting Evidence Into Practice® (PEP) CIPN Team consisted of two advanced practice nurses, two staff nurses, and a nurse researcher. The CIPN Team chose not to include animal model–based studies because applicability and generalizability to human populations has not been established. No meta-analyses addressing the prevention or treatment of CIPN were found in the literature. The team searched MEDLINE®, the National Library of Medicine’s database. Search terms included chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, peripheral neuropathy, and neuropathy. Search terms specific to known CIPN interventions also were explored, including human leukemia inhibitory factor, nerve growth factor, neurotrophin-3, exercise and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, exercise and neuropathy, diabetes and peripheral neuropathy, vitamin E, tricyclic antidepressants, amifostine, calcium/magnesium infusions, carbamazepine, glutathione, alpha lipoic acid, and glutamine. Other search terms were alternative therapy, complementary therapies, herbal therapies, plants-medicinal, herb(s), herbal(s), acupuncture, electric nerve stimulation, high-frequency external muscle stimulation, transelectrical nerve stimulation, spinal cord stimulation, anodyne therapy, pulsed infrared light therapy (PILT), social support, psychosocial support, educational interventions, patient education, patient safety, safety, injury, accidents, safety management, protective devices, and capsaicin.

 

Because data regarding CIPN-specific interventions are limited, the team also explored the diabetes and HIV literature for evidence-based interventions for peripheral neuropathy and expanded the literature search beyond five years as appropriate. Once the team members obtained the articles, they reviewed and classified them by the Oncology Nursing Society PEP Weight of Evidence Classification System, which establishes six categories by strength of evidence: recommended for practice, likely to be effective, benefits balanced with harms, effectiveness not established, effectiveness unlikely, or not recommended for practice (see Table 1). All work by the CIPN team received external peer review by known experts in the field. The review is limited to interventions for the prevention and treatment of CIPN. Interventions specific to the treatment of neuropathic pain are not covered in this review.

 

Highlights of Reviewed Literature

 

At the present time, no nursing interventions for the prevention or treatment of CIPN can be categorized as recommended for practice or likely to be effective. Evidence from studies of the various pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments reviewed failed to meet the scientific rigor necessary for practice recommendation. Although several systematic reviews have explored treatments to prevent, delay, or ameliorate CIPN, no meta-analyses have been conducted that can attest to a particular treatment benefit outweighing the potential for harm. Studies of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions with adequate sample sizes, rigorous study design, and standardized, well-established measurements of CIPN still are necessary.

 

Pharmacologic Interventions

 

In recent years, many pharmacologic agents have been tested for their efficacy in preventing or improving CIPN. Pharmacologic agents such as chemoprotectants, vitamins, electrolyte infusions, amino acids, tripeptides, neurotrophic factors, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and certain cytokines and carnitines have been the focus of recent research efforts. Currently, no evidence supports the use of pharmacologic interventions for patients experiencing CIPN. Effectiveness of pharmacologic agents to prevent or treat CIPN has not been established.

 

To obtain the most up-to-date evidence, the Oncology Nursing Society PEP CIPN Team reviewed pharmacologic studies specifically aimed at the prevention or treatment of CIPN and published in the previous five years. The search was expanded when no published research was found within the five-year timeframe. The literature clearly shows that pharmacologic agents have met with limited success in preventing or resolving CIPN in patients with cancer.

 

Chemoprotectants: Amifostine, an organic thiosulfate, is dephosphorylated in tissues to an active thiol metabolite (Hilpert et al., 2005). In the active form, amifostine detoxifies chemotherapy drugs and facilitates DNA repair while not interfering with the efficacy of chemotherapy. Three studies examined the effect of amifostine on peripheral neuropathy outcomes associated with taxane-based chemotherapy regimens (Hilpert et al.; Moore et al., 2003; Openshaw et al., 2004). In all three studies, no differences were found in sensory or motor neurotoxic symptoms in patients treated with amifostine. Amifostine also was found to be ineffective in preventing or reducing the neurotoxic effects of high-dose paclitaxel. Researchers have hypothesized that because the cytoprotective effect of amifostine occurs at the DNA level, it cannot prevent paclitaxel-induced neurotoxicities that occur with microtubular aggregation.

 

Vitamin E: As an antioxidant, vitamin E is believed to protect against cellular oxidative damage and side effects such as numbness, tingling, burning, and pain in peripheral extremities produced by cisplatin and other cytotoxic drugs (Weijl et al., 1998). Three studies examined the cytoprotective effect of vitamin E supplementation on the development of CIPN following the administration of cisplatin, paclitaxel, or a combination regimen (Argyriou et al., 2005; Bove, Picardo, Maresca, Jandolo, & Pace, 2001; Pace et al., 2003). In two studies, participants were randomized to receive either 300 mg or 600 mg of vitamin E during cisplatin chemotherapy and for three months after the completion of chemotherapy; a control group did not receive vitamin E supplementation (Argyriou; Pace et al.). Clinical and neurophysiologic examinations assessed neurotoxicity. Both studies reported the incidence of neurotoxicity to be lower in the groups who received vitamin E supplementation as compared to the control group.

 

Symptoms of CIPN and vitamin E deficiency prompted Bove et al. (2001) to measure vitamin E in the plasma of five patients (group 1) who developed peripheral neuropathy after six cycles of treatment with cisplatin and in the plasma of five patients (group 2) before and after two to four cycles of cisplatin. Results indicated that plasma levels of vitamin E were decreased in group 1. Additionally, the plasma levels of vitamin E in group 2 were significantly lower after two to four cycles of cisplatin as compared to pretreatment levels. The small pilot study suggests a relationship between cisplatin neurotoxicity and vitamin E deficiency. Randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes are needed to further evaluate the role of vitamin E in the prevention and treatment of CIPN.

 

Calcium and magnesium infusions: Oxalate, an oxaliplatin metabolite, seeks and binds to calcium and magnesium (Gamelin et al., 2004). The process may be responsible for the neurotoxic effects of oxaliplatin therapy. The efficacy of calcium and magnesium infusions as possible treatment for CIPN was tested in a small sample of patients who developed acute neurotoxic symptoms after receiving oxaliplatin.

 

Following infusion of calcium and magnesium, patients experienced improvements in pseudolaryngospasm and other clinical manifestations of acute neurotoxicity (Gamelin et al.). The same investigators tested calcium and magnesium infusions as a means of preventing neurotoxicity associated with oxaliplatin. Ninety-six patients with advanced colorectal cancer received 1 g of both calcium gluconate and magnesium sulfate before and immediately after oxaliplatin infusion. At the end of oxaliplatin therapy, 65% of the patients in the infusion group had no symptoms of neuropathy as compared to only 37% in the control group (Gamelin et al.). However, the studies used a retrospective, nonrandomized study design. Evidence from randomized, controlled clinical trials is necessary before calcium and magnesium infusions can be recommended for the prevention or treatment of CIPN.

 

Tricyclic antidepressants: Nortriptyline, the active N–demethylated metabolite of amitriptyline, blocks the reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine in the pain-modulating system in the central nervous system (Hammack et al., 2002). Tricyclic antidepressants exert analgesic effects in the treatment of CIPN; relief of neuropathic symptoms, particularly paresthesias, also has been explored. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study was conducted with 51 patients treated with cisplatin who received escalating doses of nortriptyline up to 100 mg per day over a four-week period. Questionnaires concerning pain, sleep, quality of life, and neuropathic symptoms indicated a relatively modest benefit in cisplatin-induced paresthesias over the placebo group. That one small pilot study, which lacked objective measurements of neuropathy, does not establish the effectiveness of nortriptyline in reducing neuropathy-associated paresthesias.

Anticonvulsants: Carbamazepine, an anticonvulsant drug that slows the rate of recovery of voltage-activated sodium channels, seems to protect against oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity. Carbamazepine was tested in the prevention of CIPN in one nonrandomized pilot study consisting of 10 previously treated patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving oxaliplatin, folinic acid, and 5-fluorouracil. Carbamazepine 200–600 mg was administered orally, with doses adapted to serum levels of 3–6 mg/L. Vibration sensation of the palmar surfaces of the hands and feet and subjective reports of cold-induced symptoms were assessed weekly. World Health Organization (WHO) grade 2–4 neuropathy was absent in the patients treated with carbamazepine, as compared to 30% who experienced grade 2–4 neuropathy in a historical control group (Eckel et al., 2002). Further randomized, placebo-controlled trials are necessary to determine whether carbamazepine can be used to prevent or treat CIPN.

 

Acetyl-L-carnitine: Only two small studies examined the use of acetyl-L-carnitine for CIPN. The studies tested the effectiveness of acetyl-L-carnitine in the treatment of preexisting paclitaxel- or cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. Acetyl-L carnitine was administered as 1 g via IV daily for 10 consecutive days or 1 g by mouth three times daily for eight weeks to individuals who had established paclitaxel- or cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (Bianchi et al., 2005; Maestri et al., 2005). Assessment of neuropathy symptoms, toxicity grading scales for neuropathy, and neurologic and electrophysiologic assessments were performed before and after treatment with acetyl-L-carnitine. The studies were limited by small sample sizes and nonrandomized one-group designs. Randomized clinical trials are necessary before acetyl-L-carnitine can be recommended as a potential treatment for CIPN.

 

Glutamine: Glutamine, a neutral gluconeogenic nonessential amino acid, is thought to have neuroprotective effects for patients receiving paclitaxel (Stubblefield et al., 2005). Glutamine has been shown to upregulate nerve growth factor in animal models and may have a similar action in humans (Vahdat et al., 2001). In an attempt to reduce CIPN from high-dose paclitaxel, Vahdat et al. treated 12 women with advanced breast cancer with glutamine 10 g daily for four days starting 24 hours after completion of paclitaxel. The researchers then compared neurologic findings to 33 women who did not receive glutamine. Neurologic examinations, nerve conduction studies, and symptom assessments were performed prior to paclitaxel administration and two weeks after therapy was completed. Results indicated that study participants who received glutamine had fewer symptoms, with only 8% of women reporting dysesthesias in the fingers and toes, as compared to 40% of the women who did not receive glutamine.

 

Stubblefield et al. (2005) examined the neuroprotective effect of glutamine on 46 patients scheduled to receive high-dose paclitaxel prior to stem cell transplantation. Seventeen patients received 10 g of glutamine three times daily for a total of four days beginning 24 hours after completion of paclitaxel. The remaining 29 patients made up the control group. Results of neurologic symptom questions and electrodiagnostic testing indicated that those who received glutamine developed less weakness, loss of vibratory sensation, and toe numbness as compared to the control group. Larger, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are necessary to assess the efficacy of glutamine for the prevention of CIPN.

 

Glutathione: Glutathione, a naturally occurring thiol tripeptide, may prevent neurotoxicity induced by platinum compounds by hampering the initial accumulation of platinum adducts in the dorsal root ganglia (Ocean & Vahdat, 2004). Three studies testing the potential neuroprotective effects of glutathione have been published. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 52 individuals with advanced colorectal cancer scheduled to receive oxaliplatin every two weeks for 4–12 cycles were randomized to receive glutathione 1,500 mg/m2 by IV infusion (n = 26) or a placebo infusion of normal saline (n = 26) prior to receiving oxaliplatin. Neurologic examinations, including measurements of strength and reflexes, assessment of neurologic symptoms, examination of position and vibratory sensation, and neurophysiologic evaluations of sural nerves, were conducted at baseline and at the fourth, eighth, and twelfth cycles of chemotherapy. Following all cycles of chemotherapy, the incidence of neuropathy was greater in those in the placebo group as compared to those who received glutathione. None of the patients who received glutathione experienced grade 3–4 neurotoxicity, whereas five participants who received placebo (26%) experienced grade 3–4 neurotoxicity. No changes were noted in sural nerve mean latency or sensory amplitude potential (SAP) after treatment with glutathione, whereas those who received placebo infusions experienced significant declines in SAP. Based on the preliminary data, the authors concluded that glutathione may be effective for reducing the signs and symptoms of peripheral neuropathy (Cascinu et al., 2002).

 

Smyth et al. (1997) examined the potential neuroprotective effects of glutathione in a sample of 151 women with ovarian cancer who were randomized to receive cisplatin with or without glutathione. Seventy-seven women received a placebo and 74 received glutathione 3 g/m2 every three weeks for six cycles. Audiograms and neurologic assessments were performed at baseline and after three and six cycles of therapy. More patients who received glutathione (58%) than placebo (39%) were able to receive the full six cycles of cisplatin. Women in the glutathione arm had a statistically significant 2 kg rise in weight over the course of the study (p = 0.01). Women in the study who received glutathione reported an improvement in quality of life, as evidenced by fewer depressive symptoms and better mood during cisplatin chemotherapy.

 

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessed the efficacy of glutathione in preventing CIPN in 50 chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced gastric cancer undergoing treatment with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. Twenty-five study participants in the experimental group received an infusion of glutathione 1.5 g/m2 before each weekly cisplatin treatment and by intramuscular injection on days 2 and 5, whereas the 25 control group participants received placebo infusions of normal saline. Researchers performed neurologic examinations of strength, deep tendon reflexes, neuropathy symptoms, vibration, and position sensation, as well as neurophysiologic assessment of the medial, ulnar, and sural nerves. After nine weeks, no one who received glutathione had clinical evidence of neuropathy, as opposed to 66% in the placebo group. By week 15, four participants in the glutathione arm (17%) showed clinical evidence of neurotoxicity, compared to 16 in the placebo arm (88%). No changes in SAP were noted in those who received glutathione. However, SAP was significantly affected in those who received placebo infusions (Cascinu, Cordella, Del Ferro, Fronzoni, & Catalano, 1995). Further randomized clinical trials are needed to test the effectiveness of glutathione as an intervention for CIPN.

 

Alpha lipoic acid: Although no studies have reported on the use of alpha lipoic acid in the oncology population, it has shown some benefit in the treatment of diabetic polyneuropathy. A meta-analysis of four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials including 1,258 patients with diabetic polyneuropathy demonstrated that treatment with alpha lipoic acid 600 mg per day via IV resulted in clinically significant improvements in pain, burning, parasthesias, and numbness (Ziegler, Nowak, Kempler, Vargha, & Low, 2004). Further study is needed to determine the safety and efficacy of alpha lipoic acid in the prevention and treatment of CIPN.

 

Human leukemia factor: Only one study tested recombinant human leukemia factor (rhuLIF) in a human population (Davis et al., 2005). One hundred seventeen participants were enrolled into the phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Study participants were randomized to one of three study arms: rhuLIF 2 ug/kg (n = 36), rhuLIF 4 ug/kg (n = 39), or placebo (n = 42). Neurologic assessments consisting of peripheral nerve electrophysiology testing of sensory and motor nerves, vibration threshold, and neurologic signs and symptoms were obtained prior to rhuLIF administration, after the fourth and last cycles of chemotherapy, and at three months after chemotherapy. Study results failed to show evidence that rhuLIF prevented, delayed, or diminished peripheral neuropathy. No plans have been made to continue development of rhuLIF for the prevention or treatment of peripheral neuropathy (Davis et al.).

 

Nonpharmacologic Interventions

 

Effectiveness has not been established for many nonpharmacologic interventions for the prevention or treatment of CIPN. Interventions with insufficient data or data of inadequate quality are included in this review. Because of a lack of studies focused specifically on CIPN, the authors also evaluated studies of nonpharmacologic approaches in diabetes- or HIV-induced peripheral neuropathy.

 

Acupuncture: The team reviewed five studies that used acupuncture for the treatment of peripheral neuropathy resulting from chemotherapy, diabetes, or HIV. Only one small case study (Wong & Sagar, 2006) reported the use of acupuncture specifically for CIPN. Five consecutive patients (60–71 years old, with greater than WHO grade II CIPN symptoms and advanced gynecologic cancers treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel) were given acupuncture treatment once a week for six weeks followed by four weeks of rest and then a second course of acupuncture for six additional weeks. Gait improved significantly in the three patients with balance disturbances. Following acupuncture treatment, the five patients experienced improvement in sensation, gait, and balance and had decreased analgesic dosages. Some control of symptoms (pain, numbness, and tingling of fingers and toes) was obtained after the first treatment. No adverse side effects occurred, and the benefits of acupuncture were maintained for six months for four of the five patients involved.

 

Acupuncture also has been studied in diabetic and HIV populations with mixed results. In one randomized, controlled trial, a population of diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy experienced a significant improvement in nerve conduction velocities. Ninety individuals with diabetic peripheral neuritis were randomized equally to one of three groups: wrist-ankle acupuncture, body acupuncture, or routine Western medical treatment (control), which included vitamin B1 and B12 injections daily for three seven-day courses with two-day breaks between courses. The therapeutic benefits of improved blood sugar, blood viscosity, lipid levels, and peripheral nerve function obtained with wrist-ankle acupuncture was superior to the Western medicine group; however, no differences were found between the two acupuncture groups (Jiang, Shi, Li, Zhou, & Cao, 2006).

 

In a study by Abuaisha, Costanzi, and Boulton (1998), 46 individuals with chronic and painful diabetic neuropathy received six courses of classic acupuncture analgesia using traditional Chinese acupuncture points over 10 weeks. Seventy-seven percent (n = 34) of the participants who completed the study showed improvement in subjective pain and sleep. Participants were followed for 18–52 weeks. Sixty-seven percent of participants reported stopping or reducing their pain medications, but only 21% reported complete resolution of pain. Only 24% (n = 8) required further acupuncture treatments beyond the initial six courses. No significant changes were found in peripheral neurologic examination scores, vibration perception thresholds, or glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (Abuaisha et al.).

 

One randomized, controlled trial in a population of patients with HIV and peripheral neuropathic pain (n = 250) found no significant improvements in pain scores with the use of acupuncture or amitriptyline over a control group (Shlay et al., 1998). A study using a pre-/post-treatment design examined the effects of acupuncture on 21 people with HIV-related peripheral neuropathy; the researchers found that pain and symptoms of peripheral neuropathy were reduced during the period of acupuncture treatment (Phillips, Skelton, & Hand, 2004). No studies employing acupuncture as an intervention have noted any risks or hazards associated with the treatment. The relatively small sample sizes, mixed clinical populations, varied assessments of the effectiveness of acupuncture, and lack of studies in oncology populations clearly point to the need for further research into the use of acupuncture for the treatment of CIPN.

 

Assistive devices: No studies have examined the use of assistive device in an oncology population. However, two small studies have examined the use of a cane alone or in combination with orthotics in diabetes populations (Ashton-Miller, Yeh, Richardson, & Galloway, 1996; Richardson, Thies, DeMott, & Ashton-Miller, 2004). Healthcare professionals generally refer clients with CIPN to a physical therapist for a cane, orthotic braces, or a splint to assist with lower-extremity alignment and balance. Although the use of assistive devices does not directly reduce the effects of peripheral neuropathy, some patients find them beneficial and they may help to prevent injury from sensory and motor changes.

 

Physical activity and exercise: Physical activity and exercise interventions have not been studied in the prevention or treatment of peripheral neuropathy in patients with cancer. Three studies with small sample sizes have examined progressive resistance exercise, aerobic exercise, and stretching exercises in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy and myotonic dystrophy. All three found significant improvements in outcomes such as stance, functional reach, and peroneal and sural motor nerve conduction velocity (Balducci et al., 2006; Lindeman et al., 1995; Richardson, Sandman, & Vela, 2001). However, the studies had major flaws, so the findings should be interpreted with caution. Further randomized clinical trials are needed with oncology populations.

 

A Cochrane review (White, Pritchard, & Turner-Stokes, 2004) examined the role of exercise for individuals with peripheral neuropathy from etiologies other than chemotherapy. Trials in the review included any form of exercise therapy, such as progressive resistance exercise (isometric, isotonic, or isokinetic) and/or endurance training, compared with either no exercise or an alternative form of nondrug treatment. Three identified trials included 82 patients with peripheral neuropathy of hereditary, inflammatory, or metabolic etiology. The primary outcome was functional ability at a timeframe less than eight weeks after the start of the intervention/control period. Secondary outcomes were muscle strength, endurance, psychological status or quality of life, and return to work. In addition, unfavorable secondary outcomes were assessed, including increased neurologic deficits and pain sufficient to require analgesics. Results of the included trials failed to show any effect of strengthening and endurance exercise programs on functional ability in people with peripheral neuropathy. However, evidence is emerging that strengthening exercise programs are moderately effective in reversing losses in muscle strength related to peripheral neuropathy. None of the trials fulfilled all of the criteria for methodologic quality.

 

Pulsed infrared light therapy: PILT, also called anodyne therapy, has not been studied in oncology populations. PILT consists of delivering infrared light in an effort to improve foot perfusion by stimulating nitric oxide production. It is delivered by a machine, which patients can rent or purchase. Only three studies were found that used PILT in diabetic patients with diagnosed peripheral neuropathy. Of those studies, only one used a randomized, blinded clinical trial design. Leonard, Farooqi, and Myers (2004) conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of 27 people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Significant improvements in sensation, neuropathic symptoms, and pain were found for most participants, with the exception of those with the most severe neuropathy scores. One study (n = 27) found anodyne therapy to be a safe and effective treatment that improved sensory impairments as measured by peroneal nerve function and current perception thresholds in 26 participants after 10 treatments delivered over two weeks, each lasting 40 minutes (Prendergast, Miranda, & Sanchez, 2004). Arnall et al. (2006) studied 22 subjects with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. PILT treatments were given for 30 minutes three times a week over an eight-week period. Significant improvements in sensation as measured by Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments were found. The finding held even for those with long-standing, profound diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Although no study of PILT demonstrated risks associated with the treatment, the small sample sizes, lack of oncologic study populations, and nonrandomized study designs used in two of the three studies fail to provide adequate evidence to recommend the use of anodyne therapy in CIPN.

 

Transcutaneous nerve stimulation: Transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TENS) and high-frequency external muscle stimulation have elicited some benefits in diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy but have not been investigated in an oncology population. In a randomized clinical trial, Forst et al. (2004) compared TENS with an electrically inactive device in 19 participants with diabetic neuropathy. Significant subjective improvements in neuropathy symptoms of numbness, lancinating pain, prickling sensations, and allodynia were demonstrated in 70% of treatment group participants as compared to 29% of control group participants. Reichstein, Labrenz, Ziegler, and Martin (2005) compared TENS with high-frequency external muscle stimulation in a sample of 41 diabetics. In the study, high-frequency muscle stimulation was more effective than TENS in relieving lower-extremity pain; however, both were effective in decreasing symptoms of numbness, burning, parasthesia, and dyasthesia. Only one patient reported muscular discomfort associated with high-frequency external muscle stimulation. Improvements in neuropathy symptoms were short lived; study participants reported recurrence of symptoms after several days.

 

Capsaicin ointment: To date, no studies have examined the effects of capsaicin ointment in the treatment of CIPN. Only one nonrandomized study of 13 diabetic patients with symptomatic, symmetrical peripheral neuropathy was conducted. In that study, one foot of each study participant was treated topically with 0.05% capsaicin ointment three to four times a day over an eight-week period. The contralateral foot of each participant remained untreated. Ten patients completed the study. A significant decrease in hypoesthesia was found in the capsaicin-treated feet, whereas no significant changes occurred in the control foot of each participant. Two patients discontinued treatment because of local erythema at the application site or generalized allergic skin reactions. For both participants who experienced skin effects, the effects disappeared after they discontinued the capsaicin ointment (Forst et al., 2002). The lack of studies using capsaicin ointment as a potential treatment in any population, specifically in an oncology population; the small sample size; and the lack of randomized trials prevent recommendation of capsaicin ointment in the treatment of CIPN.

 

Spinal cord stimulation: Spinal cord stimulation involves the surgical placement of leads in the epidural space to transmit pulsed energy across the spinal cord or near the desired nerve roots to control pain. It is based on the gate control theory. Spinal cord stimulation cannot be recommended for practice at this time. Only one case study was found in the literature; it reported the use of spinal cord stimulation for two patients with painful CIPN. Although the investigators reported improvements in pain, sensation, gait, and flexibility and a concurrent reduction in analgesic medication use when spinal cord stimulation was applied 6–18 hours per day, the high surgical risks and costs associated with the intervention must be weighed carefully against anticipated benefits (Cata et al., 2004).

Currently, the only interventions that can be recommended for nursing practice are education and support to preserve client safety (Almadrones & Arcot, 1999; Armstrong, Almadrones, & Gilbert, 2005; Marrs & Newton, 2003; Paice, 2007) (see Appendix).

 

·         Teach clients the signs and symptoms of peripheral neuropathy and to report them to their healthcare providers as soon as they or their families notice them.

·         Teach clients strategies for managing personal safety, such as using visual input to compensate for loss of lower-extremity sensation in navigating changing terrains.

·         Teach clients the principles of foot care, including visual inspection of the feet for injury and the importance of wearing properly fitted shoes.

·         Teach clients about the risk for ischemic and thermal injuries resulting from loss of sensation in extremities. Patients should protect body parts from cold and hot temperature extremes.

·         Teach strategies to manage symptoms of autonomic dysfunction (postural hypotension, constipation, and urinary retention), such as dangling the legs prior to standing and maintaining a high-fiber diet and adequate fluid intake.

 

Summary

 

CIPN remains a significant problem for patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer. At present, no interventions for CIPN can be recommended for practice. No rigorously designed studies, meta-analyses, or systematic reviews support any of the interventions discussed, and risk of harm may outweigh potential benefits.

 

The study designs frequently were quasiexperimental in nature, thus used comparison groups as opposed to true control groups. The measurement tools employed to determine the presence or absence of CIPN were problematic. Many studies relied on neurologic examination techniques, which can vary from examiner to examiner, making suspect the equivalence of clinical findings. Additionally, the instruments used to grade CIPN varied; some studies relied on toxicity scales such as the National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, and others used the WHO classification. The lack of standardized instruments to measure the presence or absence of CIPN makes comparison of study findings difficult. Lastly, the studies in oncology populations tended to follow CIPN development throughout chemotherapy administration, but few studies had long-term follow-up of CIPN symptoms or clinical manifestations. The studies reviewed also contained small numbers of participants. The sample sizes in CIPN intervention studies became even smaller as participants dropped out because of increased symptoms, disease progression, or death. Studies testing the efficacy of interventions aimed at preventing or treating CIPN require adequate sample sizes to have enough statistical power to detect differences between those who receive a particular test treatment and those who do not. Interventions for the prevention and treatment of peripheral neuropathy have been tested primarily in diabetes populations. Few studies of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions have focused exclusively on oncology populations. When an oncology population was used to test a promising CIPN intervention, the study sample was made up of individuals with advanced cancers only. Lastly, studies lacked sufficient details concerning procedures. Studies of nonpharmacologic interventions in particular lacked specifics regarding how treatments were applied and the exact doses received; therefore, replicating the studies to confirm or refute findings is difficult.

 

Symptoms resulting from cancer and treatments can be influenced by nursing care (Given & Sherwood, 2005). To advance the science regarding effective prevention and treatment strategies for CIPN, rigorously designed randomized clinical trials using appropriate oncology populations, adequate sample sizes, standard measurement procedures, and longitudinal follow-up of outcome measures are needed.

 

References

 

Abuaisha, B.B., Costanzi, J.B., & Boulton, A.J. (1998). Acupuncture for the treatment of chronic painful peripheral diabetic neuropathy: A long-term study. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 39, 115–121.

 

Almadrones, L., & Arcot, R. (1999). Patient guide to peripheral neuropathy. Oncology Nursing Forum, 26, 1359–1360.

 

Argyriou, A.A., Chroni, E., Koutras, A., Ellul, J., Papapetropoulos, S., Katsoulas, G., et al. (2005). Vitamin E for prophylaxis against chemotherapy-induced neuropathy: A randomized controlled trial. Neurology, 64, 26–31.

 

Armstrong, T., Almadrones, L., & Gilbert, M. (2005). Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Oncology Nursing Forum, 32, 305–311.

 

Arnall, D.A., Nelson, A.G., Lopez, L., Sanz, N., Iversen, L., Sanz, I., et al. (2006). The restorative effects of pulsed infrared light therapy on significant loss of peripheral protective sensation in patients with long-term type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetologica, 43, 26–33.

 

Ashton-Miller, J., Yeh, M., Richardson, J.K., & Galloway, T. (1996). A cane reduces loss of balance in patients with peripheral neuropathy: Results from a challenging unipedal balance test. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77, 446–452.

 

Balducci, S., Iacobellis, G., Parisi, L., Di Biase, N., Calandriello, E., Leonetti, F., et al. (2006). Exercise training can modify the natural history of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications, 20, 216–223.

 

Bianchi, G., Vitali, G., Caraceni, A., Ravaglia, S., Capri, G., Cundari, S., et al. (2005). Symptomatic and neurophysiological responses of paclitaxel- or cisplatin-induced neuropathy to oral acetyl-L-carnitine. European Journal of Cancer, 41, 1746–1750.

 

Bove, L., Picardo, M., Maresca, V., Jandolo, B., & Pace, A. (2001). A pilot study on the relation between cisplatin neuropathy and vitamin E. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Cancer Research, 20, 277–280.

 

Cascinu, S., Catalano, V., Cordella, L., Labianca, R., Giordani, P., Baldelli, A.M., et al. (2002). Neuroprotective effect of reduced glutathione on oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20, 3478–3483.

 

Cascinu, S., Cordella, L., Del Ferro, E., Fronzoni, M., & Catalano, G. (1995). Neuroprotective effect of reduced glutathione on cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 13, 26–32.

 

Cata, J.P., Cordella, J.V., Burton, A.W., Hassenbusch, S.J., Weng, H.R., & Dougherty, P.M. (2004). Spinal cord stimulation relieves chemotherapy-induced pain: A clinical case report. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 27, 72–78.

 

Cavaletti, G., & Zanna, C. (2002). Current status and future prospects for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity. European Journal of Cancer, 38, 1832–1837.

 

Davis, I.D., Kiers, L., MacGregor, L., Quinn, M., Arezzo, J., Green, M., et al. (2005). A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase II trial of recombinant human leukemia inhibitory factor (rhuLIF, emfilermin, AM424) to prevent chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Clinical Cancer Research, 11, 1890–1898.

 

Eckel, F., Schmelz, R., Adelsberger, H., Erdmann, J., Quasthoff, S., & Lersch, C. (2002). [Prevention of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy by carbamazepine. A pilot study.] Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 127, 78–82.

 

Forst, T., Nguyen, M., Forst, S., Disselhoff, B., Pohlmann, T., & Pfutzner, A. (2004). Impact of low frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on symptomatic diabetic neuropathy using the new Salutaris device. Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolism, 17, 163–168.

 

Forst, T., Pohlmann, T., Kunt, T., Goitom, K., Schulz, G., Lobig, M., et al. (2002). The influence of local capsaicin treatment on small nerve fibre function and neurovascular control in symptomatic diabetic neuropathy. Acta Diabetologica, 39, 1–6.

 

Gamelin, L., Boisdron-Celle, M., Delva, R., Geurin-Meyer, V., Ifrah, N., Morel, A., et al. (2004). Prevention of oxaliplatin-related neurotoxicity by calcium and magnesium infusions: A retrospective study of 161 patients receiving oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for advanced colorectal cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, 10, 4055–4061.

 

Given, B., & Sherwood, P. (2005). Nursing sensitive patient outcomes—A white paper. Oncology Nursing Forum, 32, 773-784.

 

Hammack, J., Michalak, J., Loprinzi, C., Sloan, J., Novotny, P., Soori, G., et al. (2002). Phase III evaluation of nortriptyline for alleviation of symptoms of cisplatinum-induced peripheral neuropathy. Pain, 98, 195–203.

 

Hilpert, F., Stahle, A., Tome, O., Burges, A., Rossner, D., Spathe, K., et al. (2005). Neuroprotection with amifostine in the first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer with carboplatin/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. A double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II study from the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynakologische Onkologoie (AGO) Ovarian Cancer Study Group. Supportive Care in Cancer, 13, 797–805.

 

Jiang, H., Shi, K., Li, X., Zhou, W., & Cao, Y. (2006). Clinical study on the wrist-ankle acupuncture treatment for 30 cases of diabetic peripheral neuritis. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 26, 8–12.

 

Leonard, D.R., Farooqi, M.H., & Myers, S. (2004). Restoration of sensation, reduced pain, and improved balance in subjects with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study with monochromatic near-infrared treatment. Diabetes Care, 27, 168–172.

 

Lindeman, E., Leffers, P., Spaans, F., Drukker, J., Reulen, J., Kerckhoffs, M., et al. (1995). Strength training in patients with myotonic dystrophy and hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy: A randomized clinical trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 76, 612–620.

 

Maestri, A., De Pasquale Ceratti, A., Cundari, S., Zanna, C., Cortesi, E., & Crino, L. (2005). A pilot study on the effect of acetyl-L-carnitine in paclitaxel- and cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. Tumori, 91, 135–138.

 

Marrs, J., & Newton, S. (2003). Updating your peripheral neuropathy “know how.” Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 7, 299–303.

 

Mitchell, S.A., & Friese, C.R. (n.d.). Weight of evidence. Retrieved October 19, 2006, from http://www.ons.org/outcomes/tables/sleep/woe.shtml

 

Moore, D., Donnelly, J., McGuire, W.P., Almadrones, L., Cella, D.F., Herzog, T.J., et al. (2003). Limited access trial using amifostine for protection against cisplatin and three hour paclitaxel-induced neurotoxicity: A phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21, 4207–4213.

 

Ocean, A.J., & Vahdat, L.T. (2004). Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: Pathogenesis and emerging therapies. Supportive Care in Cancer, 12, 619–625.

 

Openshaw, H., Beamon, K., Synod, T.W., Longmate, J., Slatkin, N.E., Doroshaw, J.H., et al. (2004). Neurophysiolgical study of peripheral neuropathy after high-dose paclitaxel: Lack of neuroprotective effect of amifostine. Clinical Cancer Research, 10, 461–467.

 

Pace, A., Savarese, A., Picardo, M., Maresca, V., Pacetti, U., Del Monte, G., et al. (2003). Neuroprotective effect of vitamin E supplementation in patients treated with cisplatin chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21, 927–931.

 

Paice, J.A. (2007). Peripheral neuropathy: Experimental findings, clinical approaches. Supportive Oncology, 5(2), 61–63.

 

Phillips, K.D., Skelton, W.D., & Hand, G.A. (2004). Effect of acupuncture administered in a group setting on pain and subjective peripheral neuropathy in persons with human immunodeficiency virus disease. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 10, 449–455.

 

Postma, T.J., & Heimans, J.J. (2000). Grading of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Annals of Oncology, 11, 509–513.

 

Prendergast, J.J., Miranda, G., & Sanchez, M. (2004). Improvement of sensory impairment in patients with peripheral neuropathy. Endocrine Practice, 10, 24–30.

 

Reichstein, L., Labrenz, S., Ziegler, D., & Martin, S. (2005). Effective treatment of symptomatic diabetic polyneuropathy by high-frequency external muscle stimulation. Diabetologia, 48, 824–828.

 

Richardson, J.K., Sandman, D., & Vela, S. (2001). A focused exercise regimen improves clinical measures of balance in patients with peripheral neuropathy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82, 205–209.

 

Richardson, J.K., Thies, S., DeMott, T., & Ashton-Miller, J.A. (2004). Interventions improve gait regularity in patients with peripheral neuropathy while walking on an irregular surface under low light. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52, 510–515.

 

Shlay, J.C., Chaloner, K., Max, M.B., Flaws, B., Reichelderfer, P., Wentworth, D., et al. (1998). Acupuncture and amitriptyline for pain due to HIV-related peripheral neuropathy: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 280, 1590–1595.

 

Smyth, J.F., Bowman, A., Perren, T., Wilkinson, P., Prescott, R.J., Quinn, K.J., et al. (1997). Glutathione reduces the toxicity and improves quality of life of women diagnosed with ovarian cancer treated with cisplatin: Results of a double-blind, randomized trial. Annals of Oncology, 8, 569–573.

 

Stubblefield, M.D., Vahdat, L.T., Balmaceda, A.B., Troxel, A.B., Hesdorffer, C.S., & Gooch, C.L. (2005). Glutamine as a neuroprotective agent in high-dose paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy: A clinical and electrophysiologic study. Clinical Oncology, 17, 271–276.

 

Vahdat, L., Papadopoulos, K., Lange, D., Leuin, S., Kaufman, E., Donovan, D., et al. (2001). Reduction of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy with glutamine. Clinical Cancer Research, 7, 1192–1197.

 

Weijl, N.I., Hopman, G.D., Wipkink-Bakker, A., Lentjes, E.G., Berger, H.M., Cleton F.J., et al. (1998). Cisplatin combination chemotherapy induces a fall in plasma antioxidants of cancer patients. Annals of Oncology, 9, 1331–1337.

 

White, C.M., Pritchard, J., & Turner-Stokes, L. (2004). Exercise for people with peripheral neuropathy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD003904. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003904.pub2.

 

Wong, R., & Sagar, S. (2006). Acupuncture treatment for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy—A case series. Acupuncture in Medicine, 24(2), 87–91.

 

Ziegler, D., Nowak, H., Kempler, P., Vargha, P., & Low, P.A. (2004). Treatment of symptomatic diabetic polyneuropathy with the antioxidant alpha-lipoic acid: A meta-analysis. Diabetic Medicine, 21, 114–121.

 

 

Constance Visovsky, PhD, RN, ACNP, is an associate professor in the College of Nursing at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha; Mary Collins, MSN, RN, OCN®, is an advanced practice nurse at the Carle Clinic Cancer Center in Urbana, IL; Linda Abbott, RN, MSN, AOCN®, CWON, is an advanced practice nurse in the Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics in Iowa City; Julie Aschenbrenner, RN, BSN, OCN®, is a staff nurse in the blood and marrow transplant unit at the Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center; and Connie Hart, BSN, RN, OCN®, is a clinical educator at the Carle Foundation Hospital in Urbana, IL. No financial relationships to disclose. (Submitted February 2007. Accepted for publication July 27, 2007.)

 

Author Contact: Constance Visovsky, PhD, RN, ACNP, can be reached at cvisovsky@unmc.edu, with copy to editor at CJONEditor@ons.org.

 

Digital Object Identifier:10.1188/07.CJON.901-913