Xiangyong, Y., Zhongsheng, Y., Wenchao, L., Hui, D., Shuzhou, Q., Gang, C., . . . Lian, Z. (2016). External application of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of bone cancer pain: A meta-analysis. Supportive Care in Cancer, 24, 11–17. 

DOI Link

Purpose

STUDY PURPOSE:  Assess efficacy of external application of traditional Chinese medicine for cancer-related bone pain
 
TYPE OF STUDY:  Meta analysis and systematic review

Search Strategy

DATABASES USED: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Collaboration and four Chinese databases
 
KEYWORDS: bone cancer pain, metastatic bone, external treatment, traditional Chinese medicine, herbal medicine
 
INCLUSION CRITERIA: RCT
 
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Not stated

Literature Evaluated

TOTAL REFERENCES RETRIEVED: N = 439
 
EVALUATION METHOD AND COMMENTS ON LITERATURE USED:  Cochrane risk of bias assessment

Sample Characteristics

FINAL NUMBER STUDIES INCLUDED: N =  5
 
SAMPLE RANGE ACROSS STUDIES: Sample sizes for each study not provided
 
TOTAL PATIENTS INCLUDED IN REVIEW: 534
 
KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Not provided

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

Applications: Palliative care

Results

Analysis showed improved partial pain response with Chinese medicine compared to sustained release morphine or bisphosphonates (RR = 1.18, p = 0.02)

Conclusions

External application of traditional Chinese herbal medicine was shown here to improve pain response rate in patients with metastatic bone pain; however, the quality of the evidence is insufficient to draw firm conclusions

Limitations

All studies were deemed to be of low quality. The authors noted that included studies were mainly from Chinese publications, and that it is known that negative results are not published in China. This suggests important publication bias.

Nursing Implications

There is currently insufficient good quality evidence to demonstrate efficacy of traditional Chinese herbal medicine for pain management. Findings of this meta analysis suggest promise for this type of intervention as adjunctive treatment; however, well-designed research is needed for evaluation of the evidence.

Legacy ID

5845